High Expectations

Set high expectations for all students. Provide high-quality curricula and support so all students can reach them. Expand high-quality preschool and full-day kindergarten to ensure school readiness.

Why This Recommendation Is Necessary

Efforts to increase accountability and provide additional resources to improve public education will be undermined completely if we don’t hold the same high expectations for all students, regardless of personal circumstance. This means providing them with the supports and experiences they need to succeed, helping parents to get involved in the process, and then raising the bar as we measure students’ performances.
If we want to hold students to high expectations, we also have to provide them with the tools they need to succeed.

Our recommendations seek to raise expectations for our students by calling for:

  • Aligning statewide curricula to high standards; and
  • Having students demonstrate high school level achievement by requiring them to pass the Connecticut Academic Performance Test (or equivalent proficiency measure) before receiving a diploma.
We want to provide students with the supports that they need to succeed at these levels by calling for:
  • Expanding access to high-quality preschool and full-day kindergarten;
  • Maximizing parental involvement;
  • Identifying and supporting low-achieving students early in their academic careers; and
  • Using frequent student progress measures to inform instruction.

Aching to learn more about how we can raise expectations of our students? Read pages 12-15 of our report!

2014 Policy Progress Report

Our 2014 Policy Progress Report uses a rubric, based on our policy recommendations, to track our state’s progress in effecting the changes needed to narrow Connecticut’s widest-in-the-nation achievement gap. While tremendous progress has been made over the last few years, comparatively little progress was made in 2014. You can read the entire 2014 Policy Progress Report here, or learn about our state’s progress in promoting High Expectations below.

2(a) Expand High-Quality Preschool and Full-Day Kindergarten to Ensure School Readiness Rubric

Connecticut receives 0 out of 4 points for expanding high-quality preschool and full-day kindergarten opportunities. Although not yet sufficient to meet need, Connecticut has continued to make meaningful progress in providing preschool opportunities to low-income students. In 2013, the state funded 1,000 slots for school readiness programs,14 and the 2015 budget funded another 1,020 slots15. CCER estimates that there are approximately 5,500 needed slots that have yet to be funded.16 Additionally, the legislature approved funding for a competitive ten-year plan called Smart Start in 2014. This program provides $205 million over 10-years to fund subsidies for public school districts to expand early childhood programming. Districts may receive funding for renovating classrooms to accommodate preschool programs, and to cover annual operating expenses.17

Although not required by law, most of Connecticut’s Alliance Districts have actually implemented full-day kindergarten programs. As of the 2013-2014 school year, only three Alliance Districts did not provide full-day kindergarten programs for their students.18 Connecticut should build on this progress to require all-day kindergarten in all of the lowest-performing schools.

Finally, Connecticut must develop a quality rating and improvement system (QRIS) to monitor the effectiveness of early childhood programs. A strong QRIS would both publicly rate the quality of early childhood programs and provide these programs with a track for improvement. Legislation passed in 2012 requires the development of a QRIS for early childhood programs.19 In 2013, $2.1 million were allocated in state bonds to fund the development of a framework for the QRIS,20 and the legislature also allocated additional funding in 2015 focused on improving the quality of early childhood programs. However, these increases in funding are insufficient to meet the requirements of the new system, and Connecticut still lacks a QRIS.

2(a) EXPAND HIGH-QUALITY PRESCHOOL AND FULL-DAY KINDERGARTEN TO ENSURE SCHOOL READINESS RUBRIC
0 out of 4 Available Points
bullet-pink The CSDE establishes a quality rating system for programs providing early childcare and early education.
bullet-pink The CSDE publicly reports on data in the quality rating system.
bullet-pink All-day kindergarten is required for all students in the 30 lowest-performing districts. 48
bullet-pink CT provides sufficient funding for all low-income three- and four-year olds to attend high-quality preschool programs.

 

rubric-key2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

14. Office of Fiscal Analysis (2014). Connecticut State Budget FY 2013 Revisions, p. 297. Retrieved July 2014 at http://www.cga.ct.gov/ofa/Documents/year/BB/2013BB-20120720_FY%2013%20Connecticut%20Budget%20Revisions.pdf.
15. Office of Fiscal Analysis (2014). Budget Highlights: FY 15 Revised Budget. Retrieved June 2014 at http://www.cga.ct.gov/ofa/Documents/year/HLT/2014HLT-20140507_Highlights%20of%20the%20FY%2015%20Revised%20Budget.pdf.
16. This is a calculated number. According to Connecticut’s Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge, about 34% (27,120) of children aged 0-5 are low-income. From that number, we subtracted the 20,600 preschool-aged students in School Readiness programs, Head Start programs, and high-quality Child Care Centers. (Data from Connecticut Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge (2012). Retrieved August 2014 at http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop-earlylearningchallenge/applications/2013-connecticut.pdf.) This yields 6,520 needed slots. If we then subtract the 1,020 additional slots promised in 2015, we get the approximation that 5,500 slots are still needed.
17. On the capital side, school districts can receive one-time grants of up to $75,000 to renovate public school classrooms for early childhood programs. For operating funding (which districts can get for 5 years), school districts can receive $5,000/student up to $75,000/classroom for up to a maximum of 4 classrooms ($300,000) per school district. (P.A. 14-41, Section 1.)
18. Connecticut Office of Early Childhood and Connecticut State Department of Education (2014). Kindergarten Enrollment by School Districts: School Year 2013-2014. Retrieved August 2014 at http://www.ctearlychildhood.org/uploads/6/3/3/7/6337139/profile_of_kindergarten_programs_2013-2014.pdf.
19. P.A. 12-116, Section 3.
20. Office of Fiscal Analysis (2013). Analysis of State Bond Commission Agenda Items. Retrieved June 2014 at http://www.cga.ct.gov/ofa/Documents/year/SBC/2013SBC-20130621_Analysis%20of%20State%20Bond%20Commission%20Agenda%20Items%20for%20June%2021,%202013%20Meeting.pdf.
48. In the original 2009 report published by the Connecticut Commission on Educational Achievement and adopted by CCER, the recommendation was for this reform to be implemented in the lowest-performing 5% of elementary schools. At the time, No Child Left Behind (NCLB) had outlined intervention processes in the lowest-performing 5% of schools. However, today, Connecticut has received a waiver from NCLB, and its framework for intervention instead contemplates district-level turnaround. Accordingly, this rubric has been amended to reflect both the spirit of the original recommendation and the reality of Connecticut’s circumstances.

2(b) Maximize the Power of Parental Involvement

Connecticut receives 1 out of 3 points for maximizing parental involvement. The Connecticut State Department of Education (CSDE) has been developing strategies to involve parents in the educations of their children. The state’s new teacher evaluation and support system requires school districts to include parental feedback in teacher evaluations, thereby providing parents with an accessible method of involving themselves in the education of their children.21 Additionally, Connecticut requires the lowest-performing schools in the state to have school governance councils.22 Each of these advisory groups must contain at least seven members who are parents or guardians elected by the parents or guardians of students attending the school.23

In 2013, the CSDE piloted a program of Parent Academies in some of the Alliance Districts, and this pilot was extended in 2014. These are programs resulting from small, competitive grants provided in partnerships with not-for-profit organizations. They are designed to encourage parents to support learning at home and in school.24 However, this remains a relatively small program.

The state should increase its strategies to maximize parental involvement, particularly for all of the Alliance Districts, with the strategic deployment of a more robust funding level for competitive grants.

2(b) MAXIMIZE THE POWER OF PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT RUBRIC
1 out of 3 Available Points
bullet-blue The CSDE develops effective strategies for involving parents in the education of their children.
bullet-pink The CSDE deploys these strategies in the 30 lowest-performing districts.49
bullet-pink The CSDE establishes a competitive grant program, possibly with philanthropic funds, to promote these programs.

 

rubric-key2014

 

 

 

 

 

21. Connecticut State Department of Education (2014). 2014 SEED Handbook CT’s System for Educator Evaluation and Development. Retrieved July 2014 at http://www.connecticutseed.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/SEED_Handbook_2014.pdf.
22. C.G.S. 10-223j.
23. Ibid.
24. Connecticut State Department of Education (2013). Request for Proposals: Parent Academy Program. Retrieved June 2014 at http://www.sde.ct.gov/sde/lib/sde/pdf/rfp/rfp402_Parent_Academy_2013_14.pdf.
49. In the original 2009 report published by the Connecticut Commission on Educational Achievement and adopted by CCER, the recommendation was for this reform to be implemented in the lowest-performing 5% of elementary schools. At the time, No Child Left Behind (NCLB) had outlined intervention processes in the lowest-performing 5% of schools. However, today, Connecticut has received a waiver from NCLB, and its framework for intervention instead contemplates district-level turnaround. Accordingly, this rubric has been amended to reflect both the spirit of the original recommendation and the reality of Connecticut’s circumstances.

2(c) Align Statewide Curricula to High Standards

Connecticut receives 3 out of 4 points for aligning statewide curricula with high standards. Over the last few years, the CSDE has established a statewide plan for the implementation of the Common Core.

In 2012, the CSDE appointed a Chief Academic Officer. This official is responsible for overseeing standards implementation, as well as the assessment of curriculum and instruction. Under this leadership, the CSDE and the Connecticut State Board of Education (CSBE) have developed a plan for districts to align curricula with the Common Core by the 2014-2015 school year.25 Additionally, the CSDE has partnered with LearnZillion to build a cohort of teachers from across the state who will serve as Common Core ambassadors.26 Finally, Governor Malloy established an Educators’ Common Core Implementation Taskforce in 2014, a 25-member group tasked with identifying challenges and making recommendations associated with Common Core implementation.27 In response to the recommendations of the Taskforce, Governor Malloy launched the “Connecticut Core Initiative,” designed to provide public schools with additional resources to implement Common Core, continue an open dialogue with stakeholders, and fund professional development programs for educators.28

As part of its efforts to implement the Common Core, the CSDE has also created a website that includes model curricula and lesson plans for district, school, and classroom use.29 Included on the website are professional development opportunities for educators to learn about how to use these new standards in their classrooms.30

However, the implementation of Common Core can only be successful if it is implemented with fidelity across all school districts. One of the goals set for Connecticut’s Alliance Districts (as articulated through statute31 and through instructions to these districts32) is to implement Common Core. Ultimately, the Commissioner of Education has the option to withhold current year funding if an Alliance District’s plan does not satisfy him, and to penalize the district (in the future) if the funding is not spent according to plan.33

In order to ensure that curricula are actually aligned with the new standards, the CSBE should consider acting on its authority to audit curricular materials in the lowest-performing schools.

2(c) ALIGN STATEWIDE CURRICULA TO HIGH STANDARDS RUBRIC
3 out of 4 Available Points
bullet-blue The CSDE makes available online model curricula that are aligned with the Common Core.
bullet-blue The CSDE implements a coordinated statewide plan for training and supporting implementation of the Common Core.
bullet-pink The CSBE acts on its authority to audit curricular materials in the lowest-performing schools.
bullet-blue CT monitors and supports the lowest-performing districts to ensure appropriate implementation of the Common Core.

 

rubric-key2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25. Connecticut State Department of Education (2012). Common Core State Standards Strategic Plan. Retrieved June 2014 at http://www.sde.ct.gov/SDE/lib/SDE/pdf/ccss/ccss_strategic_plan_SBE_120512.pdf.
26. LearnZillion (n.d.). Apply to join the Connecticut Dream Team! Website. Retrieved June 2014 at https://ctdreamteam.fluidreview.com.
27. Governor Dannel Malloy Website (2014). Educator’s Common Core Implementation Taskforce. Retrieved July 2014 at http://www.governor.ct.gov/malloy/cwp/view.asp?a=3997&q=542008.
28. Governor Malloy Press Release (2014). Gov. Malloy Launches “Connecticut Core Initiative.” Retrieved June 2014 at http://www.governor.ct.gov/malloy/cwp/view.asp?A=4010&Q=547590.
29. Connecticut Core Standards website. Retrieved June 2014 at http://ctcorestandards.org/.
30. Connecticut Core Standards website. Professional Development Opportunities. Retrieved June 2014 at http://ctcorestandards.org/?page_id=1955.
31. C.G.S. 10-262u of the 2014 Supplement to the General Statutes.
32. The first priority for Year 3 Alliance District plans is “the transition to Common Core State Standards and next-generation assessments”. (Connecticut State Department of Education (n.d.). Alliance Districts. Retrieved June 2014 at http://www.sde.ct.gov/sde/cwp/view.asp?a=2683&Q=334226.)
33. C.G.S. 10-262u of the 2014 Supplement to the General Statutes.

2(d) Identify and Support Low-Achieving Students Early in Their Academic Careers

Connecticut receives 1 out of 4 points for identifying students who are falling behind and providing them with appropriate academic interventions.

In 2012, as part of a kindergarten to grade 3 literacy pilot program, specific academic interventions were required for students who did not read proficiently.34 These interventions included mandated summer school and individualized instruction.35 This pilot program has been extended through FY 2015-2016, after which the CSDE will report on the success of the pilot.36 The CSBE also approved a new “Menu of Research-Based K-3 Universal Screening Reading Assessments” in its July 2014 meeting. This is intended to provide the guidance needed to implement a universal assessment of K-3 reading proficiency beginning in FY 2015-16, which would serve as a precursor to academic interventions.37

In addition to these measures and to providing the Scientific Research-Based Interventions (SRBI) model currently being implemented, Connecticut must require districts and schools to offer low-achieving students additional opportunities for academic intervention. Such interventions might include summer school, customized learning experiences, extended day programs, in-school tutoring, or Saturday academies. Once these offerings are in place, legislation should be established to require students to attend such programs if their assessment results and other indicators show they have fallen behind.

2(d) IDENTIFY AND SUPPORT LOW-ACHIEVING STUDENTS EARLY IN THEIR ACADEMIC CAREERS RUBRIC
1 out of 4 Available Points
bullet-pink CT enacts legislation requiring districts and schools to provide academic interventions—including opportunities such as summer school, customized learning experiences, extended day programs, in-school tutoring, or Saturday academies.
bullet-blue CT enacts legislation requiring students in grades 1-2 to attend such programming if assessment scores indicate that they are far behind in reading or math.
bullet-pink CT enacts legislation requiring students in grades 3-5 to attend such programming if they fall below the designated proficiency standard on statewide assessments.
bullet-pink CT enacts legislation requiring students in grades 6-11 to attend such programming if they have any two of the following risk factors: falling below the designated proficiency standard on statewide assessments, excessive absences, or course failure.

 

rubric-key2014

 

34. C.G.S. 10-14u, as amended by P.A. 13-245.
35. P.A. 13-245.
36. P.A. 14-217.
37. Connecticut State Board of Education (2014). Minutes for State Board of Education Meeting. Retrieved August 2014 at http://www.sde.ct.gov/sde/lib/sde/pdf/board/minutes2014/minutes_sbe_070914.pdf.

2(e) Measure Student Progress Frequently

Connecticut receives 0 out of 4 points for measuring student progress frequently.

Connecticut’s implementation of the Common Core will be accompanied by a standardized test that is aligned to those standards, called the Smarter Balanced Assessment. This test promises to make student results available more quickly so that they can be used to impact instruction.38

Additionally, the Smarter Balanced Assessment is designed to include optional formative assessments. In fact, in 2014 the Performance Evaluation Advisory Council (PEAC) recommended—and the State Board of Education approved—amending the educator evaluation and support system, so that any test included in an educator evaluation must have benchmarks leading up to that test.39 This type of formative test will allow teachers to use test results throughout the school year to inform their instructional practices and address the learning needs of individual students.40 While many districts in the state participated in a “field test” of this new assessment this year, the complete Smarter Balanced Assessment is not yet available.

Besides making assessment results available in a timelier manner, the CSDE should also establish statewide instructional and school climate benchmarks—ideally to be implemented in all schools, but particularly in the lowest-performing districts. In 2012, the CSDE received a waiver from the Elementary and Secondary Schools Act (more commonly known as No Child Left Behind), based in part on an agreement to use assessment benchmarks to hold school districts accountable for student learning outcomes.41 Connecticut has since provided schools with performance goals for improved student achievement, increased high school graduation rates, and reduced achievement gaps.42 Annually, the state measures the progress each district makes towards its performance targets through a District Performance Index (DPI).43 However, this year, because Connecticut is moving to a new form of assessment, the DPIs will not be implemented.

In 2012, Connecticut also began to implement biennial school climate surveys,44 which could potentially lead to the establishment of school climate benchmarks.

2(e) MEASURE STUDENT PROGRESS FREQUENTLY RUBRIC
0 out of 4 Available Points
bullet-pink CT makes statewide assessment scores available to school districts and teachers within 45 days of the assessment date so that results can be used to make instructional decisions during the school year.
bullet-pink The CSBE acts on its authority to establish instructional and learning environment benchmarks for the 30 lowest-performing districts.50
bullet-pink The CSBE acts on its authority to establish instructional and learning environment benchmarks for all schools.
bullet-pink All schools are required to administer assessments three times a year, based upon Connecticut Benchmark Assessment Systems that the CSDE builds out to align all grades and subjects to state standards.51

 

rubric-key2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

38. Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (n.d.). Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved June 2014 at http://www.smarterbalanced.org/resources-events/faqs/ (“Teachers, principals, and parents can receive results from computerized assessments in weeks, not months.”).
39. Connecticut State Board of Education (2014). Minutes of the May 7, 2014, State Board of Education Meeting. Retrieved August 2014 at http://www.sde.ct.gov/sde/lib/sde/pdf/board/minutes2014/minutes_sbe_050714.pdf.
40. Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (n.d). A Summary of Core Components. Retrieved June 2014 at http://www.smarterbalanced.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Smarter-Balanced-Core-Components.pdf.
41. US Department of Education (2012). ESEA Flexibility Request. Retrieved June 2014 at http://www.sde.ct.gov/sde/lib/sde/pdf/nclb/waiver/esea_flexibility_request_052412.pdf.
42. Ibid.
43. Connecticut State Department of Education (n.d.). District and School Performance Reports. Retrieved June 2014 at http://www.csde.state.ct.us/public/performancereports/20122013reports.asp.
44. CT C.G.A 10-222d; See also Letter from Lol Fearon to Superintendents of Schools (2012). Climate Surveys. Retrieved June 2014 at http://www.sde.ct.gov/sde/lib/sde/pdf/equity/Climate_Survey_letter.pdf.
50. In the original 2009 report published by the Connecticut Commission on Educational Achievement and adopted by CCER, the recommendation was for this reform to be implemented in the lowest-performing 5% of elementary schools. At the time, No Child Left Behind (NCLB) had outlined intervention processes in the lowest-performing 5% of schools. However, today, Connecticut has received a waiver from NCLB, and its framework for intervention instead contemplates district-level turnaround. Accordingly, this rubric has been amended to reflect both the spirit of the original recommendation and the reality of Connecticut’s circumstances.
51. In our original report, this rubric called for the administration of assessments three times a year, based upon Connecticut Benchmark Assessment Systems. This rubric has been amended to reflect both the spirit of the original recommendation and the reality that Connecticut has undertaken statewide implementation of the Common Core State Standards and associated assessments.

2(f) Set High Expectations for What Students Should Know and Be Able to Do

Connecticut receives 1 out of 4 points for setting high expectations for what students should know and be able to do.

Connecticut adopted the Common Core State Standards in 2010.45 Shortly thereafter, many districts began working to implement the Common Core, and, in the 2013-2014 school year, the CSDE began to ramp up its efforts to support statewide Common Core implementation.46 With the statewide implementation of the Common Core, Connecticut has established a standard for proficiency in subject-matter knowledge in Reading and Math for all grade levels.

Connecticut has yet to implement exit exams to ensure that students have mastered the necessary skills for success before graduating from high school. Existing legislation states that, beginning with the class of 2020, high school students will have to take and pass end of year tests in Algebra I, Geometry, Biology, American History, and grade 10 English.47 However, these tests and interventions have yet to be implemented. When they are eventually implemented, Connecticut should also provide pre-assessment supports and post-assessment retake opportunities.

1of4

2(f) SET HIGH EXPECTATIONS FOR WHAT STUDENTS SHOULD KNOW AND BE ABLE TO DO RUBRIC
1 out of 4 Available Points
CT establishes a proficiency standard for subject-matter knowledge.
bullet-pink In accordance with subject-matter proficiency standards, students are required to pass standardized tests in order to graduate from high school.
bullet-pink The CSBE provides resources to support pre-assessment early intervention.
bullet-pink The CSBE provides retake opportunities for students who do not achieve a passing score on the high school assessment tests.

 

rubric-key2014

 

45. CT State Board of Education (2010). February 3, 2010 Meeting Minutes. Retrieved March 2014 at http://www.sde.ct.gov/sde/lib/sde/pdf/board/minutes2010/Minutes_SBE_020310.PDF.
46. Connecticut State Department of Education (2012). Common Core State Standards Strategic Plan. Retrieved June 2014 at http://www.crec.org/tls/curriculumcouncil/CCSS_Strategic_Plan_RESCversions_12-5-12.pdf.
47. C.G.S. 10-221a of the 2014 Supplement to the General Statutes.